?

Log in

Bunting does it again - Zarbi [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
zarbi

free web stats

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| The Tufted Titmouse The Rehtorical Ranter Billy's Occasional Blog Philip's Tea Fuelled Madness Big Al Anna Banana Strawmen MPhil Diacanu Quine The Critical Thinker's Speakeasy Skepticality Quetz The Erudite Redneck Ivellios The Philosophical Neuron Russell Blackford The Bald Black Hole ]

Bunting does it again [Apr. 6th, 2009|09:00 am]
zarbi
Madeline Bunting is at it again, constructing straw men with passion and efficiency:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/05/christianity-new-atheism-faith

The argument she constructs is tediously simplistic: that the so-called "new atheists" are out to wreck all belief in myth, and destroy the power of stories, restricting what people can say, and think, removing any moral foundation from their lives.

Where are the "foghorn voices" she complains about? Richard Dawkins, with his search for truth, and campaigns for the teaching of science without the influence of religion? Dan Dennett with his gentle request for the teaching of all major religions to children so that they can judge facts for themselves? How about her fellow Guardian contributor A. C. Grayling? How about Jonathan Miller? David Attenborough? It is true that Christoper Hitchens speaks with a passion and takes no prisoners, but to call his elegant and witty contributions to the discussion "foghorn" is crass.

Maybe it is because voices are speaking in ways that have rarely been heard in recent times that what they say shocks some people. A quiet voice where there has long been silence can seem deafening.

What the New Atheists want is not to remove the power of myth from societies. Their views are in no way about certainty, as Bunting asserts (this is so clearly the case it is hard to attribute her words to ignorance), but about fairness in society and the rights of individuals. Personal belief in myth is one thing, but for a group to claim authority and the right to respect because of their belief in myth is quite another, and has been a damaging and divisive influence. Myth can, and does, provide a moral foundation for some people, but it is no basis for policy in a fair and democratic society.

There are two arguments to be had against religion. The first is its removal as a justification for public policy. The second is about its factual basis as a view of reality. The first should be a matter for urgent legal and political campaigning, in areas such as the appointment of bishops in the House of Lords, and the status of faith schools. The second can be a matter of polite discussion, while respecting personal freedom of belief. Far from ranting about "foghorn voices", Bunting should, if she is a supporter of freedom and democracy, be supporting the first argument with enthusiasm. Somehow I doubt we will see that happen.
LinkReply

Comments:
From: (Anonymous)
2009-04-06 09:03 am (UTC)

Off-topic

Don't think you're escaping Laurie and Vaal hiding here Zara! You're sorely missed over at RD.net. It's lucky that people like Russell Blackford are holding the fort. There's clear-thinking eloquence for you. Still we could do with some of the king(sorry Queen)of concept compression's brilliant one-liners...

Bendigeidfran
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zarbi
2009-04-06 09:41 am (UTC)

Re: Off-topic

You are very kind, but I think I would get drawn too much into discussions again if I returned. I realise now how much I time I spent on that site.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: ext_99146
2009-04-06 12:54 pm (UTC)
Religion is built on lies. I'm not surpised one bit
(Reply) (Thread)
From: ext_109245
2009-04-07 01:05 am (UTC)

Oh geez, I didn't even look at the bunting thread, or this post until now, she said we're attacking myth?

F&*k her!!

Funny, I recently did a post on that very topic.

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/2009/04/where-myth-goes-to-die.html
(Reply) (Thread)
From: ext_109245
2009-04-07 01:34 am (UTC)
*Back from actually reading the article*

Oooo, that horrible, horrible cow....

The attack on science makes me grind my teeth, and worry for civilization, but religion's insistence that they own "myth", and that art would die without their horrible shit, and horrible myth, gets me right where I live as an artist/writer, and makes my hands shake with fury....

There's nothing they won't stoop to, nothing.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: ext_110243
2009-04-10 01:56 pm (UTC)

Bunting Does It Again

I came across this article, as a habitual Guardian reader, and after I'd calmed down a bit started to draft something, but happily I read this first where you say things much better than I ever could. I think this sums it up:

Personal belief in myth is one thing, but for a group to claim authority and the right to respect because of their belief in myth is quite another, and has been a damaging and divisive influence.

Well said...

Mark_W
(Reply) (Thread)